Bills · 119th Congress · Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan’’; and for other purposes.

Set your address to see how your representatives voted.

Roll calls on this bill

Votes on passage
HouseOn Agreeing to the Resolution · 9/3/25A “rule” for debateA vote to adopt a special rule — a resolution from the Rules Committee setting how a bill will be debated and which amendments are allowed. Adopting it is not a vote on the bill itself, which comes later.House Rules Committee: Special Rule Process ↗
Passed
  • Democratic0 Yea · 208 Nay · 0 Present · 4 Not voting
  • Republican212 Yea · 0 Nay · 0 Present · 6 Not voting
  • Independent / Other0 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Present · 0 Not voting
Official summary (CRS)

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; and for other purposes.

Full text on congress.gov ↗
Sponsor
Rep. H. Morgan Griffith ( Republican · VA-9)
Cosponsors
0
Introduced
9/3/25
Policy area
Congress
Status
9/3/25Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
9/3/25On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 208, 1 Present (Roll no. 222). (text: CR H3771)
9/3/25Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 208, 1 Present (Roll no. 222). (text: CR H3771-3772: 1)
9/3/25On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 209 (Roll no. 221).
9/3/25DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 672.
9/3/25Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3771-3779)
9/3/25Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 42.
9/3/25The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4553 under a structured rule, and H.J. Res. 104, H.J. Res. 105, and H.J. Res. 106 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and a motion to recommit on each measure. The resolution further provides that H. Res. 668 and H. Res. 605 are adopted, and H. Res. 598 is laid on the table.
9/3/25The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-232, by Mr. Griffith.