Bills · 119th Congress · Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2240) to require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2243) to amend title 18, United States Code, to improve the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act and provisions relating to the carrying of concealed weapons by law enforcement officers, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2255) to allow Federal law enforcement officers to purchase retired service weapons, and for other purposes.

Set your address to see how your representatives voted.

Roll calls on this bill

Votes on passage
HouseOn Agreeing to the Resolution · 5/14/25A “rule” for debateA vote to adopt a special rule — a resolution from the Rules Committee setting how a bill will be debated and which amendments are allowed. Adopting it is not a vote on the bill itself, which comes later.House Rules Committee: Special Rule Process ↗
Passed
  • Democratic0 Yea · 203 Nay · 10 Not voting
  • Republican215 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Not voting
  • Independent / Other1 Yea · 0 Nay · 0 Not voting
Official summary (CRS)

No summary available.

Full text on congress.gov ↗
Sponsor
Rep. Chip Roy ( Republican · TX-21)
Cosponsors
0
Introduced
5/13/25
Policy area
Congress
Status
5/13/25Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 27.
5/13/25The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
5/13/25The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-95, by Mr. Roy.
5/14/25Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
5/14/25On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 203 (Roll no. 127). (text: CR H2014-2015)
5/14/25Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 203 (Roll no. 127). (text: CR H2014-2015)
5/14/25On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 204 (Roll no. 126).
5/14/25Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2022-2023)
5/14/25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 405, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Leger Fernandez demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
5/14/25DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 405.
5/14/25Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2014-2021)