Bills · 119th Congress · Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117–169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.

Set your address to see how your representatives voted.

Roll calls on this bill

Votes on passage
HouseOn Agreeing to the Resolution · 2/24/26A “rule” for debateA vote to adopt a special rule — a resolution from the Rules Committee setting how a bill will be debated and which amendments are allowed. Adopting it is not a vote on the bill itself, which comes later.House Rules Committee: Special Rule Process ↗
Passed
  • Democratic0 Yea · 187 Nay · 27 Not voting
  • Republican207 Yea · 0 Nay · 10 Not voting
  • Independent / Other1 Yea · 0 Nay · 0 Not voting
Official summary (CRS)

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.

Full text on congress.gov ↗
Sponsor
Rep. H. Morgan Griffith ( Republican · VA-9)
Cosponsors
0
Introduced
2/24/26
Policy area
Congress
Status
2/24/26Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2/24/26On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269)
2/24/26Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269)
2/24/26On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 189 (Roll no. 73).
2/24/26Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2277-2279)
2/24/26POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1075, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2/24/26DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1075.
2/24/26Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2269-2276)
2/24/26Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
2/24/26The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758 under a closed rule with one motion to recommit for each bill. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each bill.
2/24/26The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-515, by Mr. Griffith.