Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7160) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the limitation on the amount certain married individuals can deduct for State and local taxes, and providing for consideration of the resolution (H.Res. 987) denouncing the harmful, anti-American energy policies of the Biden administration, and for other purposes.
Set your address to see how your representatives voted.
Roll calls on this bill
Votes on passage
HouseOn Agreeing to the Resolution · 2/14/24A “rule” for debateA vote to adopt a special rule — a resolution from the Rules Committee setting how a bill will be debated and which amendments are allowed. Adopting it is not a vote on the bill itself, which comes later.House Rules Committee: Special Rule Process ↗
Failed
- Democratic0 Yea · 207 Nay · 5 Not voting
- Republican195 Yea · 18 Nay · 6 Not voting
- Independent / Other0 Yea · 0 Nay · 0 Not voting
Official summary (CRS)Full text on congress.gov ↗
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7160) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the limitation on the amount certain married individuals can deduct for State and local taxes, and providing for consideration of the resolution (H.Res. 987) denouncing the harmful, anti-American energy policies of the Biden administration.
Cosponsors
0
0
Introduced
2/5/24
2/5/24
Status
2/5/24Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 61.
2/5/24The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 7160 and H. Res. 987 under a closed rule with one hour of debate on each measure. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 7160.
2/5/24The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-373, by Mr. Langworthy.
2/5/24Introduced in House
2/14/24Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2/14/24On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 195 - 225 (Roll no. 48).
2/14/24Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by recorded vote: 195 - 225 (Roll no. 48).
2/14/24On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 209 (Roll no. 47).
2/14/24Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H617-618)
2/14/24POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 994, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Leger Fernandez demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2/14/24DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 994.
2/14/24Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H595-603; text: CR H595)