Bills · 118th Congress · Crime and Law Enforcement

NDO Fairness Act

Set your address to see how your representatives voted.

Roll calls on this bill

Votes on passage
HouseOn Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass · 5/15/23Suspension of the rulesA fast-track House procedure, usually for measures expected to have broad support. Debate is limited to 40 minutes, no amendments can be offered, and it needs a two-thirds vote of members voting — not a simple majority. A yes vote passes the bill.Rules of the House, Rule XV, clause 1 ↗
Passed
  • Democratic200 Yea · 0 Nay · 13 Not voting
  • Republican212 Yea · 0 Nay · 10 Not voting
  • Independent / Other0 Yea · 0 Nay · 0 Not voting
Official summary (CRS)

NDO Fairness Act

This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.

Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order.

Full text on congress.gov ↗
Sponsor
Rep. Scott Fitzgerald ( Republican · WI-5)
Cosponsors
1
Introduced
5/5/23
Policy area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Status
5/5/23Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
5/5/23Introduced in House
5/10/23Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
5/10/23Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
5/15/23Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
5/15/23On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 0 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H2321-2322)
5/15/23Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 0 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H2321-2322)
5/15/23Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2330)
5/15/23At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
5/15/23DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. R. 3089.
5/15/23DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3089.
5/15/23Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2321-2323)
5/15/23Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
5/15/23Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 37.
5/15/23Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-54.
5/16/23Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.