Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.
Where it stands
- Introduced1/25/24
- Agreed to in HouseAgreed to 3/21/24
- Senate
Agreed to in the House 222–196 on March 21, 2024 (Roll Call 97 →). Received in the Senate on March 22, 2024. No Senate action since.
Set your address to see how your representatives voted.
Roll calls on this bill
Votes on passage
HouseOn Agreeing to the Resolution · 3/21/24ResolutionA vote to adopt a resolution. A simple resolution (H.Res. or S.Res.) deals only with the chamber voting — its internal business, or a stated position such as a censure. A concurrent resolution (H.Con.Res. or S.Con.Res.) needs both chambers. Neither goes to the president or has the force of law.Senate glossary: simple resolution ↗Senate glossary: concurrent resolution ↗
Passed
- Democratic10 Yea · 195 Nay · 8 Not voting
- Republican212 Yea · 1 Nay · 6 Not voting
- Independent / Other0 Yea · 0 Nay · 0 Not voting
Official summary (CRS)Full text on congress.gov ↗
This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that a carbon tax is not in the best interest of the country and would be detrimental to families and businesses.
What happens next
The Senate must agree to the same text. A concurrent resolution does not go to the President.
If it isn't agreed to by both chambers by Jan 3, 2025, it expires when the 118th Congress ends.
All actions (14)
- 1/25/24Introduced in House
- 1/25/24Submitted in House
- 1/25/24Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 3/19/24Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1085 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1023, H.R. 1121, H.R. 6009, H. Con. Res. 86, H. Res. 98and H.R. 7023. The resolution provides for consideration H.R. 1023, H.R. 1121, H.R. 6009, H. Con. Res. 86, and H. Res. 987 under a closed rule, and H.R. 7023 under a structured rule, each with one hour of general debate. The rule provides for one motion to recommit each on H.R. 1023, H.R. 1121, H.R. 6009, and H.R. 7023.
- 3/21/24Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1085. (consideration: CR H1309-1314)
- 3/21/24Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1023, H.R. 1121, H.R. 6009, H. Con. Res. 86, H. Res. 987 and H.R. 7023. The resolution provides for consideration H.R. 1023, H.R. 1121, H.R. 6009, H. Con. Res. 86, and H. Res. 987 under a closed rule, and H.R. 7023 under a structured rule, each with one hour of general debate. The rule provides for one motion to recommit each on H.R. 1023, H.R. 1121, H.R. 6009, and H.R. 7023.
- 3/21/24DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 86.
- 3/21/24The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 3/21/24POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res 86, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (MO) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- 3/21/24Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1321)
- 3/21/24Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 196 (Roll no. 97). (text: CR H1309)
- 3/21/24On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 196 (Roll no. 97). (text: CR H1309)
- 3/21/24Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 3/22/24Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance.